[Linux manuál]
Návod, kniha: Linux Programmer's Manual
An epoll set is connected to a file descriptor created by
epoll_create(2). Interest for certain file descriptors is then
registered via epoll_ctl(2). Finally, the actual wait is started by
epoll_wait(2).
On the contrary, when used as a Level Triggered interface, epoll is by
all means a faster poll(2), and can be used wherever the latter is used
since it shares the same semantics. Since even with the Edge Triggered
epoll multiple events can be generated up on receival of multiple
chunks of data, the caller has the option to specify the EPOLLONESHOT
flag, to tell epoll to disable the associated file descriptor after the
receival of an event with epoll_wait(2). When the EPOLLONESHOT
flag is specified, it is caller responsibility to rearm the file descriptor
using epoll_ctl(2) with EPOLL_CTL_MOD.
When used as an Edge triggered interface, for performance reasons, it is
possible to add the file descriptor inside the epoll interface (
EPOLL_CTL_ADD ) once by specifying ( EPOLLIN|EPOLLOUT ).
This allows you to avoid continuously switching between EPOLLIN and
EPOLLOUT calling epoll_ctl(2) with EPOLL_CTL_MOD.
epoll: Zařízení pro oznámení událostí I / O
Originální popis anglicky: epoll - I/O event notification facilityNávod, kniha: Linux Programmer's Manual
STRUČNĚ
#include <sys/epoll.h>POPIS / INSTRUKCE
epoll is a variant of poll(2) that can be used either as Edge or Level Triggered interface and scales well to large numbers of watched fds. Three system calls are provided to set up and control an epoll set: epoll_create(2), epoll_ctl(2), epoll_wait(2).NOTES
The epoll event distribution interface is able to behave both as Edge Triggered ( ET ) and Level Triggered ( LT ). The difference between ET and LT event distribution mechanism can be described as follows. Suppose that this scenario happens :- 1
- The file descriptor that represents the read side of a pipe ( RFD ) is added inside the epoll device.
- 2
- Pipe writer writes 2Kb of data on the write side of the pipe.
- 3
- A call to epoll_wait(2) is done that will return RFD as ready file descriptor.
- 4
- The pipe reader reads 1Kb of data from RFD.
- 5
- A call to epoll_wait(2) is done.
- i
- with non-blocking file descriptors
- ii
- by going to wait for an event only after read(2) or write(2) return EAGAIN
EXAMPLE FOR SUGGESTED USAGE
While the usage of epoll when employed like a Level Triggered interface does have the same semantics of poll(2), an Edge Triggered usage requires more clarifiction to avoid stalls in the application event loop. In this example, listener is a non-blocking socket on which listen(2) has been called. The function do_use_fd() uses the new ready file descriptor until EAGAIN is returned by either read(2) or write(2). An event driven state machine application should, after having received EAGAIN, record its current state so that at the next call to do_use_fd() it will continue to read(2) or write(2) from where it stopped before.
struct epoll_event ev, *events;
for(;;) {
nfds = epoll_wait(kdpfd, events, maxevents, -1);
for(n = 0; n < nfds; ++n) {
if(events[n].data.fd == listener) {
client = accept(listener, (struct sockaddr *) &local,
&addrlen);
if(client < 0){
perror("accept");
continue;
}
setnonblocking(client);
ev.events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLET;
ev.data.fd = client;
if (epoll_ctl(kdpfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, client, &ev) < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "epoll set insertion error: fd=%d0,
client);
return -1;
}
}
else
do_use_fd(events[n].data.fd);
}
}
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (from linux-kernel)
- Q1
- What happens if you add the same fd to an epoll_set twice?
- A1
- You will probably get EEXIST. However, it is possible that two threads may add the same fd twice. This is a harmless condition.
- Q2
- Can two epoll sets wait for the same fd? If so, are events reported to both epoll sets fds?
- A2
- Yes. However, it is not recommended. Yes it would be reported to both.
- Q3
- Is the epoll fd itself poll/epoll/selectable?
- A3
- Yes.
- Q4
- What happens if the epoll fd is put into its own fd set?
- A4
- It will fail. However, you can add an epoll fd inside another epoll fd set.
- Q5
- Can I send the epoll fd over a unix-socket to another process?
- A5
- No.
- Q6
- Will the close of an fd cause it to be removed from all epoll sets automatically?
- A6
- Yes.
- Q7
- If more than one event comes in between epoll_wait(2) calls, are they combined or reported separately?
- A7
- They will be combined.
- Q8
- Does an operation on an fd affect the already collected but not yet reported events?
- A8
- You can do two operations on an existing fd. Remove would be meaningless for this case. Modify will re-read available I/O.
- Q9
- Do I need to continuously read/write an fd until EAGAIN when using the EPOLLET flag ( Edge Triggered behaviour ) ?
- A9
- No you don't. Receiving an event from epoll_wait(2) should suggest to you that such file descriptor is ready for the requested I/O operation. You have simply to consider it ready until you will receive the next EAGAIN. When and how you will use such file descriptor is entirely up to you. Also, the condition that the read/write I/O space is exhausted can be detected by checking the amount of data read/write from/to the target file descriptor. For example, if you call read(2) by asking to read a certain amount of data and read(2) returns a lower number of bytes, you can be sure to have exhausted the read I/O space for such file descriptor. Same is valid when writing using the write(2) function.
POSSIBLE PITFALLS AND WAYS TO AVOID THEM
- o Starvation ( Edge Triggered )
- o If using an event cache...
ODPOVÍDAJÍCÍ
epoll(4) is a new API introduced in Linux kernel 2.5.44. Its interface should be finalized in Linux kernel 2.5.66.SOUVISEJÍCÍ
epoll_create(2), epoll_ctl(2), epoll_wait(2)| 2002-10-23 | Linux |